Day 3 started with the Hookers and Slicers tied at 12 each

Today’s format is individual head to head teams competing for 3 points per match, 1 Pt for the Front, 1 Pt for the back and 1 Pt total!

Dan&Frankj
Dan vs Frank: Dan shot a net 75 while Frank squeezed out a 79 net score giving the Slicers another 2.5 points leaving 1/2 point for the Hookers!
Russ vs Al: Russ shoots a net 80 with Al a net 78  and results in Hookers taking 1 point and The Slicers 2 points

After those two matches with the Slicers gaining 4.5 and The Hookers 1.5 , Slicers take a 16.5 to 15.5 lead over Hookers!

Mark vs John: Mark shot a net score of 77 and John a 73 net which gives the Hookers another 2.5 points to the Slicer’s 1/2 point.
Mike C vs Lou: Lou shoots net 91 and Mike C net 81! Slicers earn 3 points leaving the Hookers with no points in this match!

2 more matches complete! The Slicers earned another 3.5 points and Hookers got 2.5 more points!

The Team scores are now 20 for the Slicers and Hookers with 16!

Gary vs Ted: Gary shot a net 87 and Ted had a net 78. Ted scores another 2.5 points for the Slicers and Gary 1/2 point for the Hookers!
Randy vs Steve: Steve had net 84 while Randy had a difficult time with net 89. This gives the Hookers 2.5 more points and Slicers 1/2 point!

OK, 3 groups in the, The Hookers and Slicers earned 3 more points each! 

Team scores stand at  Slicers 23, Hookers 19!

Matt vs George: George netted a nice 78 while Matt struggled to get net 90! George managed to score 3 more for the Hookers shutting out the Slicers for this match
Rick vs Mike B: Rick shot a net 77 with Mike B shooting net 86! This gave the Slicers another 2.5 and Hookers 1/2 point!

And that’s it folks the Final group is in!  The Hookers won another 3.5 points and Slicers earned 2.5 more points! 

 

The Slicers win 25.5 to 22.5

Other Stats for the day!

 CTP (3 holes per round)

Frank (1)

John (1)

George (1)

Low Gross: 

Dan (81),  Russ (85)

 

Low Net: 

John (73),   Rick  (77)

Skins:

Al (1),    Matt (1),     Mark (1)

Steve (3),       Mike C. (2)

Frank.  (2)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *